I voted yes for the background check, on a question in today’s edition of WSJ,
For individuals owning or attempting to purchase a weapon of any kind, but with assumption that it will be a constitutional background check and our rights are not abridged, infringed up on, or violated.
The talking points given to us don’t support our rights, we have “The Constitution of The United States” that does that. I totally agree and I suppose, that most reasonable people would agree, that crazy people should not be armed, drive cars or teach our children, question that I have is who should decide, who is crazy or not?
For that to be legitimate most of us would need to declare voluntarily, not by law or coercion that “I am my brother’s keeper” and that could be a slippery slope, it would most surely create a witch hunt.
Criminal element cannot be regulated. Criminals will find a gun or whatever implement is at hand to commit a crime.
If I my please suggest that we all start familiarizing ourselves with the bill of rights.
Keep in touch
captainvarga 